Pros and Cons of the current Alcon IT management system Essay

Pros and Cons of the flowing Alcon IT management system - Essay ExampleAn different major disadvantage of the management at Alcon is the sovereign operation of each of the business groups in the execution of their activities. They have adopted a culture of self-reliant operation for each of the group and minimum cooperation among the groups. This leads to the independent execution of tasks from each group. Cooperation among different business groups in any organization helps in providing support and alters work handling. The position of embodied Director of IT plays a full of life role in the management hierarchy of the organization (Stair & Reynolds). Its long va goatcy has affected the operation of the other groups below it in the hierarchy because they were operating without corporate governance. This put the organization at such a disadvantage that they had to create a new position to help with the situation. The decentralization of the management process trick besides pla y as a strength for the organization. This is in the sense that, with their own management of trading trading operations few groups will execute their operation better that others, hence singling out the poor performing branches. This can serve as a wakeup call for the improvement of the poor performing branches. The decentralization of operations also improves accountability in the dispensation and use of funds. With every branch allocated its own budget, accountability for the use of these funds in achieved more comprehensively The Alcan management also outsourced a lot of the work. This made then unaware of some of the workings and utilization of resources. The new enterprise architecture management system The vice president of Corporate Information Technology, Robert Ouellette had a vision of how he wanted to run the management at Alcan. After be brought on board, he performed an analysis and decided to be intimate up with a new way of operation. His main(prenominal) targe t was to achieve cohesion and cooperation among the business groups. This was to be achieved at different levels. The new system, although with advantages, did not come without a few setbacks. The main advantage of his system was development of better working relations among the departments. This helped improve work execution, although as a disadvantage, the lesser performing groups could easily go unnoticed, because their work seems complete. To tackle this, he made it a requirement, that in every team, the head of department and their officers were to report on the progress on their activities to higher management. This immensely improves accountability. The other major problem was the definition of roles in the management hierarchy. Due to undecipherable definition of roles, some activities were not properly executed. The advantage of Roberts system is that, it clearly defines the roles of each position. Robert looked to stir up the operations of the major braches in the organi zation. This was to be achieved by the implementation of the enterprise architecture. The architecture ideally centralizes operations and integrates the business activities of the organization with the IT infrastructure (Anderson). This greatly improves coordination among all the functions. This will lead to the creation of a centrally shared business center for the Information Systems within the organization. The disadvantage of this change is that implementation is mostly achieved at the management level hence, the human resource at the